I'm an Australian, so I gave them my UTAS email address (after logging in to be certain it still exists), and I told them:
"I strongly believe that any combination of people who love one another and wish to marry one another should be permitted to do so. There should be no restrictions regarding the number of individuals who wish to join themselves in marriage, nor should there be any restrictions regarding the sex or gender of any of the individuals involved. I further believe that no one should ever be required to marry anyone if they do not wish to do so. I also believe that people who are not ministers of religion should be permitted to be marriage celebrants, as there are many of us who are opposed to organized religion, and some of them still wish to marry."
which, at 117 words, is well within their 250 word limit...
It might be slightly contradictory to saying "yes" to the bills as written, but I did anyway, without bothering to look up the exact wording of the bills, since I trust you.
no subject
"I strongly believe that any combination of people who love one another and wish to marry one another should be permitted to do so. There should be no restrictions regarding the number of individuals who wish to join themselves in marriage, nor should there be any restrictions regarding the sex or gender of any of the individuals involved. I further believe that no one should ever be required to marry anyone if they do not wish to do so. I also believe that people who are not ministers of religion should be permitted to be marriage celebrants, as there are many of us who are opposed to organized religion, and some of them still wish to marry."
which, at 117 words, is well within their 250 word limit...
It might be slightly contradictory to saying "yes" to the bills as written, but I did anyway, without bothering to look up the exact wording of the bills, since I trust you.