blamebrampton (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
blamebrampton) wrote2011-01-08 04:37 pm
blamebrampton) wrote2011-01-08 04:37 pm
A case in point ...
So, there we were, having a chat on a friend's LJ about the differences between the US and the UK for purposes of a self-Britpicking list, with participants from both sides of the pond and beyond and frequent diversions into baiting and comedy from all sides, and apparently it has become a source of Flocked Drama.
Consider the argument very carefully: At least one American is very upset that British people prefer to be depicted in accurate ways.
And if you can't see why that's a bit dodgy, replace the word British with any other nationality.
I don't want to overstate the case, because really, it doesn't culturally oppress us the way that some other cultures have been oppressed by this sort of thing, since we don't deeply care and we had an Empire first. And while the original source of the complaint is a preference, it's certainly not a sine qua non, and we read heaps of stuff that gets us wrong, and some of it is good and some is crap, and really, at the end of the day we still pronounce and spell aluminium in ways that are scientifically logical, which in itself is enough. But, honestly ...
Interestingly, one of my points of difference was a tendency to soap-opera-like over-reactions in fiction. Clearly I drew the line too narrowly.
AND I left off the fact that it the entire United States has been the subject of mass-brainwashing to accept caffeinated flavoured beverages as coffee. Though I see Starbucks has dropped the word from their logo, truth in advertising at last!
Consider the argument very carefully: At least one American is very upset that British people prefer to be depicted in accurate ways.
And if you can't see why that's a bit dodgy, replace the word British with any other nationality.
I don't want to overstate the case, because really, it doesn't culturally oppress us the way that some other cultures have been oppressed by this sort of thing, since we don't deeply care and we had an Empire first. And while the original source of the complaint is a preference, it's certainly not a sine qua non, and we read heaps of stuff that gets us wrong, and some of it is good and some is crap, and really, at the end of the day we still pronounce and spell aluminium in ways that are scientifically logical, which in itself is enough. But, honestly ...
Interestingly, one of my points of difference was a tendency to soap-opera-like over-reactions in fiction. Clearly I drew the line too narrowly.
AND I left off the fact that it the entire United States has been the subject of mass-brainwashing to accept caffeinated flavoured beverages as coffee. Though I see Starbucks has dropped the word from their logo, truth in advertising at last!
no subject
no subject
I do know that, my point was that there is a trend in American writing to works that are overly influenced by the tropes of soap opera.
As examples, Lost in Translation: Not Influenced -- writing based on characters and situations that come about organically, people think about their actions at length, then rethink, minimal change occurs, but that change resonates in the audience because it seems real.
Law and Order: Highly influenced -- plot searches for the bigger shock and bigger twist to a point where it becomes almost pornographic, highly unlikely chances are commonplace, no one notices when an actor who previously played character X comes back as character Y (that one you can sort of look past because people deserve work), melodrama rather than naturalism being the model. I have to say that I haven't watched enough episodes of L&O anything to know whether it picks up on the trope of misunderstandings and half-overheard things being the basis for significant disasters, but I would not be shocked if it did. Change does not really resonate in the viewer because you are fairly sure it will not be lasting and the same disasters will be back next week.
Does that make more sense? Greys Anatomy would have probably been an even better example for the second, but I am not at all convinced it's not an actual soap, despite its claims to be an adult drama. kestrelsparhawk said something very clever above, which was that soap opera may also been a strong influence on the way people react on reality TV, because that is what they are used to from people on TV. It has reached the point where if I was flicking past Survivor, or even Ellen or Oprah, and saw someone reacting with quiet modesty, I would be surprised ...