blamebrampton: 15th century woodcut of a hound (Default)
blamebrampton ([personal profile] blamebrampton) wrote2011-07-06 04:47 am
Entry tags:

GAHH!

I am the first to admit that someone should award me an honorary PhD in procrastination, but for the first time in my life my storytelling has been thwarted by my good behaviour.

I am unable to recall a single incident when I have shagged or snogged anyone wearing glasses*.

I've had to put my old sunglasses onto a handpuppet to work out logistics. And, naturally, that required another handpuppet on the other hand to keep the proportions right. Let me just say that I am glad the window in this room opens onto the garden. You would not believe the time it took!

And you thought the ukulele would be the acme of my ridiculousness this week ...**




* Surely I must have, but a taxi to the head is a powerful remover of random snoggage recollection!
** 10 notes! Three chords! Two songs!
arcanetrivia: a light purple swirl on a darker purple background (Default)

[personal profile] arcanetrivia 2011-07-06 05:38 pm (UTC)(link)
...logistics?

If you both wear glasses it can be a bit of a dodging act, depending on the frame. You probably will get a couple of clunks together. (I'm a longtime glasses wearer; so is my husband.) If only one participant is wearing glasses then personally I've never found it to be a problem, though they tend to come off for sex or for kissing that continues heavier/for a longer time.

[identity profile] blamebrampton.livejournal.com 2011-07-07 02:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, it's just one person. The puppets suggested that for general kissing they were fine, for things that were more exploratory/energetic/acrobatic, not the best, which seems to tally with your experience -- thanks for the sane input, BTW!