blamebrampton (
blamebrampton) wrote2008-09-08 09:17 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Conspiracies and their debunking
Wonderful BBC documentary on World Trade Centre Tower 7 shown tonight on the ABC (Australian version thereof). I still cannot watch any of that footage without deep sorrow, especially for the emergency workers who worked there on that day. The emergency workers interviewed in the doco regarding the many conspiracy theories were respectful and considerate of the theorists' positions, but all gave clear and unambiguous statements about the sequence of events they saw on that day, which utterly debunked the conspiracies.
Of the other interviewees, Richard Clarke, White House counter-terrorism coordinator during the Clinton and first W. Bush administrations, was particularly sane. He argued that anyone who believes that government is capable of a conspiracy on this scale has simply never worked in government. Governments are not competent enough, nor secretive enough, to accomplish a conspiracy on any broad scale. Even their pissweak conspiracies (ah Nixon ...) are soon uncovered.
It reminded me of one of my friends who took up with the naturopathic version of Amway and seriously informed me that there were several cures for cancer available, but that pharmaceutical companies kept them quiet for the money they earn on ongoing treatments.
I looked at her askance, and said, "But ... science doesn't work that way. Scientists who discovered real and easy cures for cancer, of the sort you're talking about, would first of all have been subject to peer review for years, so it wouldn't be a secret, and secondly would prefer the Nobel Prize for Medicine to any amount of money."
"They could be bought off!" she assured me.
"Have you ever met a scientist?" I asked, then reminded her the Nobel comes with a reasonable amount of cash.
In a far more banal, but similar vein, the Times online is spitting over the fact that race stewards penalised Lewis Hamilton 25 seconds in yesterday's F1 Grand Prix, relegating him to third and handing the win to Ferrari's Massa. They describe the race as one of Hamilton's 'most daring performances' and claim that it's a conspiracy against Lewis. I watched that race. The stewards were right. And Lewis drove a safe and contained race and was perfectly happy settling for second before unexpected rain handed him a massive tyre advantage on the final four laps. But that's not as exciting as the published version.
And, to end on the conspiracy theme, I do not believe the world will end on Wednesday when the Large Hadron Collider is switched on. But I do believe Professor Brian Cox is astonishingly hot for a physicist.
Of the other interviewees, Richard Clarke, White House counter-terrorism coordinator during the Clinton and first W. Bush administrations, was particularly sane. He argued that anyone who believes that government is capable of a conspiracy on this scale has simply never worked in government. Governments are not competent enough, nor secretive enough, to accomplish a conspiracy on any broad scale. Even their pissweak conspiracies (ah Nixon ...) are soon uncovered.
It reminded me of one of my friends who took up with the naturopathic version of Amway and seriously informed me that there were several cures for cancer available, but that pharmaceutical companies kept them quiet for the money they earn on ongoing treatments.
I looked at her askance, and said, "But ... science doesn't work that way. Scientists who discovered real and easy cures for cancer, of the sort you're talking about, would first of all have been subject to peer review for years, so it wouldn't be a secret, and secondly would prefer the Nobel Prize for Medicine to any amount of money."
"They could be bought off!" she assured me.
"Have you ever met a scientist?" I asked, then reminded her the Nobel comes with a reasonable amount of cash.
In a far more banal, but similar vein, the Times online is spitting over the fact that race stewards penalised Lewis Hamilton 25 seconds in yesterday's F1 Grand Prix, relegating him to third and handing the win to Ferrari's Massa. They describe the race as one of Hamilton's 'most daring performances' and claim that it's a conspiracy against Lewis. I watched that race. The stewards were right. And Lewis drove a safe and contained race and was perfectly happy settling for second before unexpected rain handed him a massive tyre advantage on the final four laps. But that's not as exciting as the published version.
And, to end on the conspiracy theme, I do not believe the world will end on Wednesday when the Large Hadron Collider is switched on. But I do believe Professor Brian Cox is astonishingly hot for a physicist.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
:D
no subject
no subject
Peace,
Bubba
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
he can experiment on me all he wants.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
He argued that anyone who believes that government is capable of a conspiracy on this scale has simply never worked in government. Governments are not competent enough, nor secretive enough, to accomplish a conspiracy on any broad scale
Exactly! I don't understand how anyone in their right mind believes the moon landing was faked, or the Holocaust. Or UFO landings. The government can't even balance the budget, so how could they be capable of conspiracy on such a massive scale?
no subject
YES! People think their politicians are simultaneously too stupid to do anything right and able to outsmart the public and the media and a battalion of experts.
no subject
Wow. I haven't followed F1 for years. Massa? Seriously? Huh. (I don't even know the other two names.)
Conspiracies are FTW - in mystery novels and as long as no one tries to make you believe they could be true.
no subject
Yup, Massa, probably now the only person who can stop Lewis (I'd probably like Lewis if it weren't for the fact that all of the F1 press are his lapdogs and I am finding it all SO BORING, so I revel in his losses when they can't run Lewis Wunderkind stories)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
He didn't cede his advantage, he merely put himself in an excellent position for the next corner, it's not the same!
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I did like how the govt analysts and the rescue workers that were there showed that respect, too Made the conspiracy theorists sound like nut cases.
no subject
Heh, I think the conspiracy theorists talking were enough to make them sound deranged.
(no subject)
no subject
"Have you ever met a scientist?" I asked, then reminded her the Nobel comes with a reasonable amount of cash.
LOLOL.
I hate Brian Cox. Dammit, no scientist should have publicity photos like that. I'd add him to my list of nemesii if he wasn't so alksdjfh.
no subject
no subject
Cox is pretty attractive, but not hotter than Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson.
no subject
Of course they will then refuse to fund any research projects for the foreseeable future, but that is what the private sector is for!
no subject
I'm looking forward to the end of the world. At least it will get me out of my appraisal.
no subject
=D You can't imagine how many times I've heard this about 9/11 (and everything else in the world). And of course there's Bush-the-Reptilian-Alien-in-a-human-Suit that wants to be the leader of The New World Order, and that it was only holograms and not real planes...
Conspiracy theories can be fun, but the 9/11 ones are always making me angry. They usually have clear political agenda, show no respect to the victims, and are supported by lies masked as facts. And those people make money out of it by selling books and DVDs.
no subject
also, i know several hot physicists (my brother being one (she says in a totally not incestual way))
no subject
no subject