![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I have a Twitter account, which I rarely use and is under a different name. One of the people who is on my flist and on my Twitter list posted a link to my Aus politics in Harry Potter terms post of last month using my Twitter name – which was perfectly fine! A very small number of people put two and two together and followed my Twitter after reading the post. Very briefly in most cases, for reasons that I will outline.
Every single one of them has been a Conservative. A really, really conservative Conservative, not an I find Boris Johnson strangely appealing and do believe in free trade but not in a wholly unregulated market, dipping my little toe in the waters of conservatism but really a Bleeding-Heart Leftie type, like me.
In fact, most have been so scarily conservative that I have not been able to Follow them on Twitter because I would froth too much, and I prefer to use it as a medium to discuss hairstyles, local cafes, meet-ups and Bob Katter on Q&A.
Intrigued, I vanity-googled my post to see if they were all coming from somewhere, and discovered that there are people who read that post who are convinced I am a card-carrying socially wet, economically dry Liberal. Which for Americans would equate to a Reagan-era Republican before they turned all gung-ho and Rambo-esque, and for Brits equates to, er, Boris Johnson.
I am counting this as a win on the not trumpeting bias front. Alas, we have a government again now, though, as both sides have appointed the previous leaders to high ranking positions in a bid to 'get past all this messy leadership coup business', things are still entertaining.
And in related internet matters, thanks,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2010-09-14 05:57 pm (UTC)Boris Johnson is a Conservative Mayor, running for re-election and saying he'll campaign as an opponent to his party's coalition with the Liberals.
So he's not a Liberal leaning Conservative.
Cameron on the other hand, he's totally in love with Clegg! *lol*
no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 03:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 05:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-14 06:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 03:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-14 06:43 pm (UTC)Mmmmmh, ungooglable.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 03:52 am (UTC)Your people are invested in you and like you, so it will be FINE.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 03:14 pm (UTC)Aw, why is Bradley so fanciable? I hope nobody calls him Brad, I suddenly caught myself thinking.
You should see my face now *g* hah invested. Oh well, if push comes to shove I can make good my threat and use a stanley knife or matches to create some imprompto performance art !o/
no subject
Date: 2010-09-14 09:21 pm (UTC)We were flying back from somewhere, I think it might be Spain, and I noticed a very blonde figure in the queue. I had to stop myself from peering too intently and squeeing mildly as it was B J himself. Shorter than I had expected, but with that affable air of charming bewilderment about him and delightfully crumpled. :-)
no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 03:56 am (UTC)And OH you made me laugh! I met Hugh Grant once and had a similar reaction, in a neat bit of tying up this comment, he walked out in front of me while I was cycling and I only avoided ploughing him down through superhuman effort.
He was suitably apologetic and Hugh Granty about it all, so he was forgiven.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-14 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 03:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 05:51 am (UTC)... your post proves simply that Conservatives have more of a sense of humour!
no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 02:14 pm (UTC)He does write well, though his editorial days were more comedic for the non-writing bits. Ah Ms Wyatt, he knew her well ...
no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 04:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 04:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 04:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 09:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-16 06:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 09:48 am (UTC)Repeat after me: What do Tories do? They grind the faces of the working poor.
Then go and listen to the complete works of Alistair Hulett.
And follow our PM's lead and buy yourself a book on the Tolpuddle Martyrs.
Rinse. Repeat.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 09:55 am (UTC)(Do you think if I bought Lucy T a cuppa she'd let me know what Malcolm uses on his hair?)
no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 09:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 10:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 10:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 11:00 am (UTC)Did I get you into trouble somehow? Because I think I was the one who posted that thing on Twitter. Or was I the only one? I can't remember, Brammers! I'm sorry!
Also, "vanity-googling" should be an official verb. As well as other Google related activities. (If you'd care to make a dictionary, I'll help with its publicity.)
Sometimes, I wish I live in a country where the politics actually matter so I don't have to post stupid comments like this!
no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 12:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 04:50 pm (UTC)