blamebrampton (
blamebrampton) wrote2009-06-12 07:05 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Hey, Americans ...
Do you ever use forms of cliché other than plain old cliché? Such as clichéd or clichés? I see it used in a manner that I would consider wrong so often that I am wondering if it is one of those wacky idioms that English develops up all around the world. Or it could just be young people today with their emo music and Twittering ...
no subject
It's not limited to the young today, though I'll happily accept the young label if you're offering. ;D Perhaps it's just a North American thing, because it's common in Canada too.
Both forms are listed in the Merriam Webster online dictionary also.
I also checked Oxford, which lists clichéd as the adjective. Since it lists cliché as a noun, it makes sense that clichés would be the plural, no?
no subject
And now I have to work out a rule for why the construction of that paragraph can be read with the reverse meaning in the US. My brain is going to melt one day ...
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Ah ... there's 1914-2008 in a nutshell ...
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
You asked whether Americans used those forms, and then went on to say that you often saw usage you considered wrong. Without further clarification, given that the overall context of an American usage question is usually to point out that American usage can permit some things British considers wrong, the whole construction comes out seeming to say "Americans, do you use these forms? I think they're weird and I wondered if you also did, or if they were correct in AmE." (at least, that's how I read it.)
no subject