blamebrampton: 15th century woodcut of a hound (Default)
[personal profile] blamebrampton
* In all the Evol BNFs kerfuffle, it occurred to me that I actually find my time in fandom hugely enriched by a group of such people, some of them BNFs, others often perceived as BNFs, a handful of BNFs of the Future and also the Exceptionally Talented Even Though They Would Never Think of Themselves as BNFs. Accordingly, I would like to thank some of them publicly. And so begins yet another ongoing project that I will finish someday, before Ragnarok. Happily, today marks the birthdays of two of the people I would have talked about anyway, so it is two birds with one stone time!

A very happy birthday
to [livejournal.com profile] dysonrules , whose kindness, jolliness and overt glee are an example for everyone in fandom. I am a mile behind in reading your stories, I confess, because I am a miserable old bugger who needs to be in the right mood for happiness, but you write very good happiness! Thank you for all the encouragement and cheer you spread around the fandom, it makes this a better place.

Happy birthday, too, to [livejournal.com profile] lillithium . Your talent stops us all in our tracks on a regular basis, but it is the gentleness you share with us through your posts and photographs that makes me think we would all enjoy knowing you in real life. However, the seriousness with which you approach your fanart inspires me, and makes me more conscious that fanworks deserve the respect of whatever time and seriousness we can spare for them.

If anyone out there wants to nick the idea to thank their own fandom favourites, do feel free!

* One of my dearest friends in all the world has even dodgier taste in men than I had previously suspected. KRudd indeed!

* Some people on LJ make up for others who are cocks. [livejournal.com profile] furiosity  responded to the hacking of [livejournal.com profile] sarahtales 's journal with a brilliant post on internet security here. (Link goes through to Dreamwidth.)

* Red lipsticks that look brilliant on everyone else in the world will look cerise on me. Apparently, I make everything paler. This means that if the one great red lippy I own ever goes out of production, I am stuffed and will have to let go of my vamp look forever. Alas, vamp, bookish lesbian, and flower-bedecked garden girl are the only three looks I have. If I lose vamp, I will have to buy some plain glasses and cultivate librarian.

* There are 2.3 million prisoners in the United States, that's more than there are in China. One in four prisoners in the world is American. I think this could be a good argument against privatised prison systems, especially when coupled with the story of the Pennsylvanian judges who took bribes from private jails to give young offenders custodial sentences. That's not what the land of the free should be like.

* I knew that the actual court ruling on Prop 8 was always going to be a nightmare and suspect it may be the only thing the justices felt they could hand down given the centrality of of voting and voter initiatives in the American political climate. It remains a fucking dreadful law, based on ludicrous premises and lies.

* My friend Rai is something of a genius. Her ink drawing of the funeral of Fred Weasley is yet further proof.




Date: 2009-05-28 04:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] astarael02.livejournal.com
I know this was waaay down your list of points in importance, but I have to ask- which red lipstick is it? *has a slight cosmetics obsession*

And also, I can't believe prop 8 is actually a real law. Just... how do they argue that it's a fair and good law to have?? I am seriously baffled. Sometimes I get so incredulous at the things people think it's not COMPLETELY WRONG to do, that I can't even think of a coherent response. I end up yelling or sputtering in the most ineloquent way. :(

Date: 2009-05-28 04:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blamebrampton.livejournal.com
I started off my categorical fail in the hunt for a new red with MAC Russian Red, a colour that looks gorgeous on practically EVERYONE, but sort of manky cherry pink on me. Laura Mercier's M was the same story, as was Nars Velvet Matte Pencil in Dragon Red, Nars Jungle Red lipstick, Kavyn Aucoin Expert Lip in Poppia and several others I lost track of.

Nars Velvet Matte Pencil in Damned gives me a nice dark blood red, so I went with that, but Chanel Rouge Allure in Lover is the only red red that stays red on my skin.

The others were all gorgeous colours, though, only altered by my underlying bluey pallor. Mmmmmm, pallor ...

Though I have just tried the Mac lipstick over the Nars pencil, and it's good! Yay!

I go through make-up phases, and probably wear it on less than 20% of workdays, but I do like to know I can turn on my Hedy Lamarr when I want to ;-)

And as to Prop 8 the law, it's DIRE. Utterly mad. Spluttering is a perfectly rational response.

Date: 2009-05-28 04:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] astarael02.livejournal.com
I've got red hair and the colouring that goes with it (well, I say red... it's ginger. Pah.) so it's really quite tricky finding makeup to suit me. In theory I think a red lipstick could work but all the ones I try look too pink or too brown. I want RED! Red makes me think of Marilyn Monroe and a sassy fanon Pansy Parkinson :D

I will check out the ones you mentioned. Any excuse to go to Sephora... :)

Date: 2009-05-28 04:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blamebrampton.livejournal.com
Yes, pink and brown are the curses of red lipstick! I do recommend those brands, even though I found it hard to get the right tone, as they all have good pigments and last for ages. Not cheap, but lasting. And try a darker pencil to hold the lipstick red if you need it, the combination of the Nars and MAC is working a treat at the moment (though I need to take it off now and go to bed!)

I like red lipstick, it says sod off without me having to say a word ;-)

Date: 2009-05-29 02:24 am (UTC)
drgaellon: Brian and Justin smooching (Kiss Me Brian Justin)
From: [personal profile] drgaellon
For the record, Prop 8 IS NOT A LAW. It is a Constitutional Amendment by referendum, which effectively made a previous law unconstitutional. The question before the Court concerned the STUPID clause in the California Constitution which allows "minor" amendments to be made by simple majority, but requires a "two-thirds" majority to change "fundamental" rights. Because of the disaster that is the California Constitution, the high court COULD NOT disallow Prop 8, which now stands. The same idiotic clause will allow a new referendum to repeal the amendment in 2010.

They need a Constitutional Convention, and they need to shred the existing Constitution and START OVER. No other state in the Union allows ANY changes to their Constitution by simple majority of a plebiscite without a waiting period, or a double vote (Massachusetts allows a simple majority - in two sequential voting cycles).

Date: 2009-05-29 05:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] astarael02.livejournal.com
Yeah, I'm British... we don't learn about the US political system unless we choose to at university. I chose chemistry and french :)
I was uing the word "law" as a layman's term for a rule, not as technical vocabulary. I just don't think a political system should allow the treatment of a group of people as lower-class citizens, that's what I'm saying. But I realize that the complexities of a political system can allow this to happen sometimes, if there are enough people agreeing with it, however much my idealism would like to think otherwise :)

Date: 2009-05-29 09:40 am (UTC)
drgaellon: Those who would be Magic's Pride must then pay Magic's Price (Magic's Price)
From: [personal profile] drgaellon
Well, the system is SUPPOSED to be designed to PREVENT the tyranny of the majority, and the courts are supposed to protect the rights of minority groups. The fact that the system has failed so spectacularly in this case only points up the deficiencies in the governing documents (i.e. the California state Constitution).

The problem now lies in the definition of "protected minority." California recognizes LGBT persons as belonging to a protected minority, and entitled to the highest level of legal scrutiny whenever their rights are threatened. Federal law does not, though DOMA has not yet been challenged in Federal court, and things like Colorado's Proposition 2 HAVE been found to violate the US Constitution. Taking THIS fight to SCOTUS NOW is likely to result in a ruling we DO NOT WANT.

Date: 2009-05-29 11:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] astarael02.livejournal.com
I see. It seems like there's quite a way to go before there's true equality. Not just in California, but using it as an example. And this is the 21st century! It makes me sad :(

Date: 2009-05-29 06:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] astarael02.livejournal.com
Oh, forgot to say, thank you for letting me know though. :)

Profile

blamebrampton: 15th century woodcut of a hound (Default)
blamebrampton

May 2020

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 3rd, 2025 05:10 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios